<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Volume</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/</link>
	<description>Custom ThinkScript Indicator Scripts for the Think Or Swim Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:36:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rick f</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>rick f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkscripter.com/?p=1243#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>Too bad this one doesn&#039;t work with Tick charts -- watching it this morning, goofy as the market is, definately looks promising!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad this one doesn&#8217;t work with Tick charts &#8212; watching it this morning, goofy as the market is, definately looks promising!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick f</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>rick f</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkscripter.com/?p=1243#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I hadn&#039;t played with many of the volume-ish indicators, but must admit this one looks to be a keeper.  Looks to be rather timely and is a nice corollary to my style of trading.  I&#039;ll watch it for a few days before incorporating it onto my charts, but I&#039;m pretty sure this will be a keeper along with my IFT-RSI as my lower-level indicators.[1]

[1] Even though I am getting more and more comfortable trading without them!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I hadn&#8217;t played with many of the volume-ish indicators, but must admit this one looks to be a keeper.  Looks to be rather timely and is a nice corollary to my style of trading.  I&#8217;ll watch it for a few days before incorporating it onto my charts, but I&#8217;m pretty sure this will be a keeper along with my IFT-RSI as my lower-level indicators.[1]</p>
<p>[1] Even though I am getting more and more comfortable trading without them!  <img src='http://www.thinkscripter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fellow TS'er</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Fellow TS'er</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkscripter.com/?p=1243#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Thank You!... This seems to give VERY reliable signals on /ES for 5 and 15 min charts... Very nice indicator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You!&#8230; This seems to give VERY reliable signals on /ES for 5 and 15 min charts&#8230; Very nice indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinkScripter</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkScripter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkscripter.com/?p=1243#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Bill,
At first glance I think we could accomplish this. That said, I&#039;d be lying if I told you I hadn&#039;t thought that on a few occasions in the past only to dive down a never ending rabbit hole. Because thinkScript lacks a true variable storage mechanism, it makes this kind of study tricky to code. Let me think about it....shoot me an email and we can discuss.
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,<br />
At first glance I think we could accomplish this. That said, I&#8217;d be lying if I told you I hadn&#8217;t thought that on a few occasions in the past only to dive down a never ending rabbit hole. Because thinkScript lacks a true variable storage mechanism, it makes this kind of study tricky to code. Let me think about it&#8230;.shoot me an email and we can discuss.<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkscripter.com/2009/05/13/four-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkscripter.com/?p=1243#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Eric, 

I had this odd idea to write another piece of intraday volume code that would look for volume anomalies by looking for irregular volume by given times.  For example, what I mean by this is to take an average of the volumes of the previous 19 days (or whatever is accessible) for the given time interval ranges (e.g. on a 5 min, between 9:30 and 9:35, 9:36 and 9:40, etc.) and then see how the current day&#039;s volume compares to it, as a guage of market participation.  Do you have any ideas on how to do this?

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, </p>
<p>I had this odd idea to write another piece of intraday volume code that would look for volume anomalies by looking for irregular volume by given times.  For example, what I mean by this is to take an average of the volumes of the previous 19 days (or whatever is accessible) for the given time interval ranges (e.g. on a 5 min, between 9:30 and 9:35, 9:36 and 9:40, etc.) and then see how the current day&#8217;s volume compares to it, as a guage of market participation.  Do you have any ideas on how to do this?</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
